Volume : 03
Issue : 03
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIAGNOSTICS AND RESEARCH
them. A critical review of the literature must
therefore tease out the distinctions between
spiritual, spiritually informed contemplative, and
mindfulness-based approaches, while recognizing
the commonalities among them as well. [7, 8]
The purpose of the present review was to bridge the
two domains together, in the first instance, by
considering classical textual ideas pertinent to
spiritually informed mental care and in the second
instance, by considering the more recent evidence
pertinent to spiritual and contemplative care for
Generation Z students. [1]
Introduction :
The Generation Z students have a very specific
position. They are the first students who have
grown up in a world where mobile internet access,
high levels of social media exposure, on- demand
communication,
and
continuous
performance
visibility are the norm. While connectedness has
provided new ways of learning and support, there
have also been increased levels of stress, distraction,
and vulnerability to social comparisons, emotional
overwhelm, and isolation. This makes student
mental health a critical concern for integrative
preventative and therapeutic interventions. [2,6]
In the holistic medical traditions, mental health is
not merely the absence of psychiatric symptoms,
but the presence of inner balance, clarity, self-
regulation, moral constraint, and a sense of
meaningfulness in life. In the Ayurvedic tradition,
mental health disturbance is seen as involving
psychophysical and spiritual factors, and the
therapeutic approaches include rational as well as
spiritual ones. The relevant approaches include
Sattvavajaya Chikitsa, or the mind-strengthening or
psychoregulatory therapies, and Daivavyapasraya
Chikitsa, or the spiritually oriented therapies. These
ideas provide a relevant classical background for
considering spiritual therapies in the context of the
mental health of students. [3-5]
Objectives:
1. To examine classical descriptions of spiritual
therapy relevant to psychological health.
2. To assess contemporary evidence for
spiritual
and
spiritually
adjacent
interventions in student populations.
3. To identify conceptual, methodological,
and
clinical
gaps
in
relation
to
Generation Z students.
This article was constructed using a systematic
review approach based on PRISMA guidelines for
systematic reviews in 2020. It integrated two bodies
of knowledge. One was classical textual knowledge
relevant to spiritual therapeutics. The other was
modern
knowledge
based
on
contemplative,
spiritual, and religious interventions in student and
youth mental health. [1]
In recent years, the mental health literature has
increasingly examined mindfulness, meditation,
yoga, prayer, and religious/spiritual coping in
adolescents, young adults, and university students.
The challenge, however, is that these approaches
are generally clustered together, despite the fact that
there are critical conceptual distinctions among
Sources of evidence
The classical sources included the Charaka Samhitā,
Suśruta Samhitā, and Aşțānga Hrdaya. The modern
knowledge base included peer-reviewed literature in
the field of contemplative, spiritual, and religious
interventions in student and youth mental health.
Copyright @ : - Dr.Avinash Wade Inter. J.Digno. and Research IJDRMSID0112 |ISSN :2584-2757
104